<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CharlieTheBroker.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charliethebroker.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charliethebroker.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:00:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Housing May Be So Much Closer to the Bottom Than You Think.</title>
		<link>http://charliethebroker.com/housing-may-be-so-much-closer-to-the-bottom-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://charliethebroker.com/housing-may-be-so-much-closer-to-the-bottom-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>charleswinokur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliethebroker.com/?p=1474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Morgan Housel &#124; More Articles January 23, 2012 &#124; Comments (12) Last month, Yale economist and housing expert Robert Shiller told me that we should be prepared for the possibility that home prices could decline in real (inflation-adjusted) terms for several decades. It&#8217;s happened before, and it will probably happen again. But there&#8217;s an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="recModule">
<div></div>
</div>
<p>By <a href="http://my.fool.com/profile/tmfhousel/info.aspx?source=iapsitlnk0000002">Morgan Housel</a> | <a href="http://www.fool.com/author/1611/index.aspx?source=iapsitlnk0000003">More Articles</a><br />
January 23, 2012 | <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/01/23/housing-may-be-so-much-closer-to-the-bottom-than-y.aspx#commentsBoxAnchor">Comments (12) </a></p>
<p>Last month, Yale economist and housing expert Robert Shiller <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/12/23/robert-shiller-on-why-home-prices-could-fall-for-s.aspx">told me</a> that we should be prepared for the possibility that home prices could decline in real (inflation-adjusted) terms for several decades. It&#8217;s happened before, and it will probably happen again.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s an important distinction to make here. Housing <em>prices</em> could stay flat or decline, but housing <em>construction</em> increasingly looks like it&#8217;s not only near a bottom, but ready to snap back. That&#8217;s important, because housing construction tends to be a big driver of economic growth. From 2003 to 2006, construction accounted for over a quarter of all economic growth. Since 2008, it&#8217;s dragged economic growth down by over 9%.</p>
<p>A few things to keep in mind: The housing bubble that caused the mess we&#8217;re in wasn&#8217;t brought about just by inflated prices, but by a massive overbuild. Because prices were so high and credit so easy to come by, homebuilders had a huge incentive to build as many homes as they could. The result was <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/10/06/creative-destruction-in-the-housing-market.aspx">epic</a>: From 2001 to 2006, 11 million homes were built in the United States, but only 8 million new households were formed.</p>
<p>To compensate for that binge, new home construction utterly fell off a cliff in recent years:</p>
<div><img src="http://g.foolcdn.com/img/editorial/HousingStarts.png" alt="anImage" /></div>
<p>Source: Federal Reserve.</p>
<p>That drop in housing construction is a big part of why the economy has been so slow. It&#8217;s not just construction jobs that get whacked when housing dries up. Everyone from mortgage brokers to <strong>Home Depot</strong> staff to furniture salesman suffer as well. And as all those workers get laid off and stop spending money, the pain moves down the economic ladder. It&#8217;s an ugly cycle.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s evidence that it&#8217;s starting to turn around.</p>
<p>Rental prices on apartments are rising briskly, and rental vacancies have dropped like a rock to the lowest level in over a decade. Apartment rental rates in several metropolitan areas are rising at double-digit rates, and nationwide are expected to rise between 4.5% and 5.5% this year. When I signed a lease on my current home of Seattle in 2009, I felt like I could negotiate nearly anything I wanted. When I renewed a few months ago, I could barely get a word in &#8212; it was &#8220;take it or leave it.&#8221; The rental vacancy rate, which was as high as 8% in 2009, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-M3lYep1BZZQ/TwU1pPPkVyI/AAAAAAAALyc/Et0PteM-7uo/s1600/ReisAptQ42011.jpg" rel="lightbox[1474]">is now</a> just 5.2%, according to housing data firm Reis. Even when the economy was booming, the vacancy rate stood at or near 6%.</p>
<p>As more young households that had been discouraged from owning a home suddenly become even more discouraged from renting an apartment &#8212; and as developers receive the demand to build more apartments &#8212; construction should rise.</p>
<p>And it looks like it already is rising. While 2011 saw the lowest level of housing starts since the Census Bureau began collecting data in the 1950s, the numbers are bouncing back ever so slowly. After bottoming at an annual rate of 480,000 in 2009, housing starts have now rebounded to around 660,000, and are expected to total over 700,000 this year.</p>
<p>The numbers <em>have</em> <em>to</em> eventually rebound &#8212; and sharply. Housing construction is at the lowest level it&#8217;s been in a half-century, but even that figure doesn&#8217;t show how depressed the industry is. When you adjust housing starts for population growth, you get a better understanding of how abandoned the industry has become:</p>
<div><img src="http://g.foolcdn.com/img/editorial/HousingPopulation.png" alt="anImage" /></div>
<p>Sources: Federal Reserve and author&#8217;s calculations.</p>
<p>Keep an eye on the y-axis. Since 1959, housing starts divided by U.S. population has averaged around 0.006. Today, it&#8217;s 0.002. Think of it that way, and it&#8217;s not a stretch to think that housing construction could eventually rebound threefold, maybe more.</p>
<p>The question is: When? And while it&#8217;s impossible to predict this stuff with any precision (if at all), I have a feeling we&#8217;re closer to the bottom than some assume. Between housing starts being unsustainably low, low vacancies pointing to pressure in the rental market, and housing numbers already starting to perk up, it looks like the tide has turned.</p>
<p>Several things could pull the market back into decline. There&#8217;s still a large number of homes waiting to be sold either by banks holding foreclosed properties or by homeowners waiting for a better price to sell. If this number &#8212; called shadow inventory &#8212; is larger than we expect, the market could face another leg down. And if unemployment rises or the economy slips back into recession, that too could send the industry back down.</p>
<p>But I think the most likely outcome is that housing will make a noticeable turn within the next year or two. That could be great for the economy, and great for companies like <strong>KB Home</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/KBH.aspx?source=isssitthv0000001">KBH</a> <a title="Add KBH to My Watchlist" href="http://my.fool.com/watchlist/add?ticker=KBH&amp;source=iwlsitbut0000010"> </a>) , <strong>MDC Holdings</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/MDC.aspx?source=isssitthv0000001">MDC</a> <a title="Add MDC to My Watchlist" href="http://my.fool.com/watchlist/add?ticker=MDC&amp;source=iwlsitbut0000010"> </a>) , and <strong>Meritage Homes</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/MTH.aspx?source=isssitthv0000001">MTH</a> <a title="Add MTH to My Watchlist" href="http://my.fool.com/watchlist/add?ticker=MTH&amp;source=iwlsitbut0000010"> </a>) &#8212; all three of which I&#8217;ve given a green thumbs-up to in my <a href="http://caps.fool.com/MyPlayer.aspx?source=imysittph0000002">CAPS</a> account.</p>
<p>Disagree? Tell me why in the comments section below.</p>
<p><a href="http://http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/01/23/housing-may-be-so-much-closer-to-the-bottom-than-y.aspx" target="_blank">Original link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charliethebroker.com/housing-may-be-so-much-closer-to-the-bottom-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denver Housing Prices See Steep Declines But Renting Is Still Popular</title>
		<link>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-housing-prices-see-steep-declines-but-renting-is-still-popular/</link>
		<comments>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-housing-prices-see-steep-declines-but-renting-is-still-popular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>charleswinokur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliethebroker.com/?p=1471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON &#8212; Even cities that weathered the housing market crash with relatively little damage are suffering now. Severe price declines have spread to Dallas, Denver, Minneapolis and Cleveland, which had mostly withstood the bust in housing since 2006. The damage has now gone well beyond cities hit hardest by unemployment and foreclosures, such as Phoenix [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Even cities that weathered the housing market crash with relatively little damage are suffering now.</p>
<p>Severe price declines have spread to Dallas, Denver, Minneapolis and Cleveland, which had mostly withstood the bust in housing since 2006. The damage has now gone well beyond cities hit hardest by unemployment and foreclosures, such as Phoenix and Las Vegas.</p>
<p>&#8220;We didn&#8217;t enjoy the highs and the lows like other cities,&#8221; said Kay Weeks, a Realtor with Ebby Halliday in Dallas, where prices fell nearly 1 percent in March and are expected to keep falling. &#8220;But when we get bad news nationally, people take notice and cut back on spending and buying homes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/01/denver-housing-prices-see_n_869807.html" target="_blank">Original posting.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-housing-prices-see-steep-declines-but-renting-is-still-popular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Cities on the Edge of Greatness”</title>
		<link>http://charliethebroker.com/%e2%80%9ccities-on-the-edge-of-greatness%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://charliethebroker.com/%e2%80%9ccities-on-the-edge-of-greatness%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 06:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>charleswinokur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliethebroker.com/?p=1467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SHELTON, CT (MAY 24, 2011) –From the hottest bats to the greenest buildings, new research commissioned by the makers of Edge® Shave Gel ranks and rates the top 50 US cities poised for greatness. The findings, fielded by research firm Sperling’s BestPlaces, examine five key areas of greatness, including sports, art, music, culture and cosmopolitan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHELTON, CT (MAY 24, 2011) –From the hottest bats to the greenest buildings, new research commissioned by the makers of Edge® Shave Gel ranks and rates the top 50 US cities poised for greatness. The findings, fielded by research firm Sperling’s BestPlaces, examine five key areas of greatness, including sports, art, music, culture and cosmopolitan factors, like LEED certifications* and population growth.</p>
<p>San Francisco (No. 1), Boston (No. 2) and Denver (No. 3) top the list, while Tampa (No. 50), Providence, RI (No. 49) and Memphis (No. 48) rounded out the rankings. The biggest difference? Researchers say burgeoning art scenes and a commitment to the environment helped propel San Francisco, Boston and Denver to the top.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bestplaces.net/docs/studies/cities_on_the_edge.aspx" target="_blank">Whole article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charliethebroker.com/%e2%80%9ccities-on-the-edge-of-greatness%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denver-area rental vacancies dip to 1.4 percent.</title>
		<link>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-area-rental-vacancies-dip-to-1-4-percent/</link>
		<comments>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-area-rental-vacancies-dip-to-1-4-percent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 02:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>charleswinokur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliethebroker.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[POSTED: 05/24/2011 12:24:43 PM MDT UPDATED: 05/24/2011 12:52:51 PM MDT DENVER—The Colorado Division of Housing says a survey of rental properties in the Denver metro area shows vacancies for the first three months of the year fell to 1.4 percent. That&#8217;s down from 3.1 percent in the same period a year ago for Adams, Arapahoe, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POSTED: 05/24/2011 12:24:43 PM MDT<br />
UPDATED: 05/24/2011 12:52:51 PM MDT</p>
<p>DENVER—The Colorado Division of Housing says a survey of rental properties in the Denver metro area shows vacancies for the first three months of the year fell to 1.4 percent.<br />
That&#8217;s down from 3.1 percent in the same period a year ago for Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver, Douglas and Jefferson counties, and housing division spokesman Ryan McMaken says it&#8217;s the lowest level recorded since 2001.</p>
<p>The division said Tuesday that average rents have been largely flat though, at $1,039 for the first quarter.</p>
<p>Nationally, 33.6 percent of households are renters, up from 31.6 percent when the housing bubble burst four years ago. Some residents have found it&#8217;s cheaper to rent than to buy a home.</p>
<p>Read more: Denver-area rental vacancies dip to 1.4 percent &#8211; The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_18128995#ixzz1NKLYA2gk<br />
Read The Denver Post&#8217;s Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-area-rental-vacancies-dip-to-1-4-percent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denver home prices back to 2000 levels.</title>
		<link>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-home-prices-back-to-2000-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-home-prices-back-to-2000-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 18:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>charleswinokur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliethebroker.com/?p=1461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Howard Pankratz The Denver Post Denver home prices are back to 2000 levels, and one-third of the homes sold for a loss in March, according to Zillow&#8217;s first quarter Real Estate News Report. The report said that negative equity is also at an all-time high in the metro area. According to the report, Denver [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:hpankratz@denverpost.com?subject=The%20Denver%20Post:%20Zillow:%20Denver%20home%20prices%20back%20to%202000%20levels"><strong>By Howard Pankratz</strong><br />
<em>The Denver Post</em></a></p>
<p>Denver home prices are back to 2000 levels, and one-third of the homes sold for a loss in March, according to Zillow&#8217;s first quarter Real Estate News Report.</p>
<p>The report said that negative equity is also at an all-time high in the metro area.</p>
<p>According to the report, Denver metro home values fell 9.6 percent year-over-year and fell 2.7 percent quarter-over-quarter to a Zillow Home Value Index of $192,300.</p>
<p>Nationally, home values fell 8.2 percent year-over-year and fell 3 percent to a Zillow Home Value Index of $169,600.</p>
<p>Home values in the Denver metro area have fallen 17.2 percent since their peak in June 2006 and are now back to the level they were in December 2000.</p>
<p>Nationally, home values have fallen 29.5 percent since their peak in June 2006.</p>
<p>Forty-one percent of all single-family homes with mortgages were underwater in the first quarter in the metro area, compared to 40.7 percent in the fourth-quarter of 2010 and 31.5 percent one year ago, according to the report.</p>
<p>Nationally, the negative equity rate is 28.4 percent.</p>
<p>In the Denver metro area, 34.3 percent of all home sold in March were sold for a loss compared to 30.4 percent on quarter ago and 29 percent in March 2010. Nationally, 37.7 percent of all homes sold for a loss — a new record.</p>
<p>Zillow, a real estate information company, said that given the latest data, it appears that the housing market nationwide will not bottom out before 2012. It said the first quarter home values nationwide match the worst of the housing recession.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_18024845" target="_blank">Original link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://charliethebroker.com/denver-home-prices-back-to-2000-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

